Measurement Criteria
1. 23 CFR 627.5
TEA-21.
2.
3. Innovative
Contracting Manual issued
Monitoring Method
1. Interview with
District Production Administrator, District Construction Engineer and
2. Review District
files on Innovative Contracting for conformance with the Innovative Contracting
Manual using checklist.
3. Visit at least one
Project, if available, that has an Innovative Contracting note, and review
using checklist.
4. Document best
practices
1. All 12 Districts
will be reviewed each year.
Results Reported
1. Written report to
the District within 2 weeks of review.
2. Written summary report
published annually
Result Shared
Written annual report
to:
1. Deputy Director of
Construction Management.
2. Assistant Director
for Highway Management.
3. Administrator
Office of Construction
4. FHWA.
5. DDD, DCE, DHMA,
Office of Quality
Compliance Tracking
1. QAR files in the Division of Construction
Management.
Compliance Follow-up
1.
Review of District performance until improved to
desired level.
2.
Review
of District supplied corrective plan if warranted.
Deputy Director
Signature _______________________________________Date ____________
Quality Assurance Review
District: ______
Central Office Reviewer: ________________________ Date of Review: _________
District Highway
Management Administrator: ________________________________________
District Production
Administrator: ________________________________________
District Construction
Engineer: ________________________________________
Review documents for
Procedure compliance:
Does District correspondence regarding a past selection of Innovative Contracting indicate review was completed within in accordance with Manual?
Explanation: _________________________________________________________________
Does District correspondence indicate the preliminary review by the following District Offices as required?
_______Planning, _______Production, _______Highway Management,
_______Real Estate, _______Construction
Explanation: _________________________________________________________________
Does the District file include a copy of the required submissions that were sent to CO?
Explanation: _________________________________________________________________
Review District
Procedure
Does the District staff have a clear understanding of the Innovative Contracting Manual and project selection process?
Explanation: _________________________________________________________________
Has the District utilized the exception review procedure?
Explanation: _________________________________________________________________
Has the District updated Ellis and submitted the tracking forms to the Central Office Coordinator?
Explanation: _________________________________________________________________
Does the District want/need training on the Innovative Contracting Manual?
Explanation: _________________________________________________________________
Innovative
Contracting Project Level Requirements:
Were Innovative Contracting related change orders entered in a timely manner? Days: __
Explanation: _________________________________________________________________
Are project personnel aware of the Innovative Contracting note used on the project?
Explanation: _________________________________________________________________
Is a CPM schedule approved that reflects the Innovative Contracting note used on the project?
Explanation: _________________________________________________________________